بررسی شیوه‌ی روایت و بینامتنیت در نمایش‌نامه‌ی زبان تمشک‌های وحشی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نمایش، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 گروه نمایش، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران ،تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jfadram.2025.385801.615974

چکیده

نمایش‌نامه زبان تمشک‌های وحشی روایتی است کابوس‌وار از نوع جریال سیال ذهن که از گونه‌ی زمانی بینابینی استفاده می‌کند و در آن از ظرفیت‌های متنوع در شیوه‌ی روایت‌گری مانند راوی ناظر سوم شخص و هم‌داستان، نشان‌گرهای آوایی، مایه‌ی محتوا، بیان‌های ذهنی، نشانه‌های کاربردی، مرزشکنی و غیره استفاده شده است. تمرکز دیگر این مقاله بر استفاده‌ی متعدد بینامتنیت و گوستینگ در ساختار این نمایش‌نامه و ارجاعات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم می‌باشد که مخاطب را برای درک جهان شخصیت‌ها یاری می‌رساند. در این مقاله سعی شده است با استفاه از تحلیل ساختار روایت و پیدا کردن سرنخ‌های زبانی که چه به شکل گفتاری و چه به شکل نمادین نویسنده از آن بهره برده شیوه‌ی روایتگری ثمینی را واکاوی کنیم. برای تحلیل جنبه‌های متفاوت شیوه‌ی روایت این نمایش‌نامه از نظریات افرادی چون مانفرد یان، میخاییل باختین، رولان بارت، کارل بوهلر، ژرار ژُنِت و دیگرانی استفاده شده است تا خواننده هرچه بیشتر با ساختار روایت مد نظر نویسنده آشنا شود. همچنین این مقاله سعی دارد با استفاده تحلیل ساختار روایت و نظام گفتمانی حاکم بر آن و همچنین بررسی بینامتنیت به کاربرده شده برای درک بیشتر جهان نمایش‌نامه و شخصیت‌ها به بررسی کارکردهای مختلف زبان در شیوه‌ی روایت ثمینی در نمایش‌نامه زبان تمشک‌های وحشی بپردازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the method of narration and intertextuality in the play of the language of wild raspberries

نویسندگان [English]

  • behrooz mahmoodi bakhtiari 1
  • razgol motamedi 2
1 Department of Performing Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Performing Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The play "The Language of Wild Raspberries" can be analyzed from different perspectives of narratology, which is due to the author's skill in using narrative techniques. The first thing that attracts the attention of the audience is the presence of a different narrator named Daniel. He is a third-person observer and co-narrator and addresses us as the audience. He does not reveal his role in the beginning and by using phonetic markers, content, mental expressions and practical signs during the play, he puts the atmosphere of the story in a frightening situation. Daniel's character is formed in such a way that he enters the story as one of the active characters in the narrative while using the deviation of levels or breaking boundaries. Using the content, he compares his troubled inner feelings to natural disasters and does it with such skill as if he finds an ideological function. Intertextuality and ghosting cause the text to be captured by elements that are familiar to the audience, and this capture makes it easier for them to communicate with the text. This phenomenon is present in the play as coded signs. In the narrative of the play, the language functions as a chronotope, and in addition to the presence of sub-narratives, the audience sees the use of the intermediate time type. The narrative process proceeds in such a way that the play has both the author's audience and the narrator's audience, and because the story is told many times from the point of view of different characters in the play, a variable focalization is created in it. This play is a narrative of the type of fluid flow of the mind that uses the intermediate time type. A nightmarish narrative in which various capacities are used in the way of narration, such as the third-person observer narrator and co-narrators, phonetic markers, subject matter, mental expressions, practical signs, deviation of levels or boundary breaking, etc. The other focus of this article is on the multiple use of intertextuality and ghosting in the structure of this play, which intelligently ties this use with the functional language of the play and uses direct and indirect references in the right place, allowing the audience to understand the world of the characters, it helps. In this article, an attempt has been made to analyze Samini's narration method by analyzing the structure of the narrative and finding the linguistic clues that the author has used, both verbally and symbolically. To analyze the different aspects of the narration of this play, the opinions of people such as Mikhail Bakhtin, Gérard Genette and others have been used so that the reader can get to know the author's intended narrative structure. Also, this article tries to analyze the different functions of language in Samini's narrative style in this play by using the analysis of the narrative structure and the discourse system that governs it, as well as the intertextuality analysis used to better understand the world of the play and the characters.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Narrative language
  • narrator
  • levels of narration
  • intertextuality
  • ghosting