Implementing the Qualitative Content Analysis in Character Based Films (Focusing on Freud's Theories and Hitchcock's Selected Films)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior and Sports Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master of General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, ToloueMehr University, Ghom, Iran.

Abstract

Sigmund Freud's theory posits that the essence of content analysis lies in uncovering the unconscious perceptions or cognitions embedded within a text. This endeavor finds its academic grounding within the discipline of psychology of art, where the underlying goals, values, cultural influences, and tendencies of creators or creations are scrutinized. Particularly within the cinematic domain, filmmakers are tasked with unraveling the intricacies of conveying meanings and messages through the nuanced language of cinema. In the latter half of the 20th century, content analysis has risen to prominence as a predominant research approach in both psychology and art studies. This study endeavors to apply qualitative content analysis (QCA) to the realm of cinema. Drawing upon Freud's psychoanalytic theory, specifically emphasizing the concept of personality, the research focuses on three seminal films by Alfred Hitchcock (Rope, Psycho, and Vertigo). Freud's theoretical framework is chosen for its influence on character development in cinema and its pioneering contributions to psychoanalysis, particularly in symbolism and personality theory. The selection of Hitchcock's films for case studies is deliberate, as they aptly showcase the centrality of character and delve into profound psychological dimensions. Personality emerges as the linchpin concept, seamlessly bridging Freud's psychoanalytic theory with the narrative intricacies of Hitchcock's films. The research methodology employs a non-random sampling strategy, guided by thematic and narrative proximity, alongside analytical indicators derived from Freud's theoretical constructs. The research methodology encompasses various analytical components, including analysis units, meaning units, content areas, and analytical categories. These components are meticulously selected through an exploratory approach, leveraging both traditional library resources and contemporary audio-visual materials. The findings of the study underscore a multifaceted analysis, encompassing the exploration of latent content, identification of primary characters, delineation of meaningful narrative sequences, and elucidation of primary thematic elements, notably instincts and anxiety. This approach ensures a deep and thorough understanding of the material. Furthermore, the research delineates two core content areas within Freud's theoretical framework: personality structure and personality levels. These delineations serve to deepen our understanding of the interplay between psychoanalytic theory and cinematic narrative, offering valuable insights into the rich tapestry of human experience depicted on the silver screen. The division of research results into descriptive and inferential parts adds another layer of depth. Based on this, the meaning units, which represent the primary scenes featuring the main characters, account for 18.42 minutes (72.52%) of the entire film in Rope, 49.59 minutes (49.45%) in Psycho, and 102.08 minutes (79.75%) in Vertigo. Therefore, the main character's presence as a meaning unit is most prominent in the film Vertigo. In short, this includes introducing main characters and analyzing how often they appear in the film, which helps analyze the content. The main themes found in analyzing these films are instincts, including themes of life and death, and anxiety, which includes real, emotional, and moral aspects. By incorporating these diverse elements, the research provides a holistic view of the psychological underpinnings in Hitchcock's works, offering a profound understanding of the characters' motivations and the films' overarching themes.

Keywords

Main Subjects


• اختیار، منصور (1348)، معنی شناسی، تهران: موسسه انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
• ایستوپ، آنتونی (1382)، ناخودآگاه، ترجمه شیوا رویگریان، تهران: قطره.
• ایمان، محمدتقی و نوشادی، محمودرضا (1390)، تحلیل محتوای کیفی، پژوهش، شماره 2، 44-15.
• آذر، ماهیار (1398)، سینما و روان‏پزشکی، تهران: کتاب ارجمند.
• آذری، غلامرضا (1377)، کاربرد تحلیل محتوا در سینما، رسانه، شماره 34، 81-76.
• آذری، غلامرضا و فرهنگی، علی اکبر (1385)، تحلیل محتوای ارتباطات غیر کلامی در بین کمدین‏های سینمای صامت کلاسیک هالیوود، هنرهای زیبا، 25(25).
• باب‏الحوائجی، فهیمه (1376)، تحلیل محتوا، مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، شماره 32، 98-108.
• بیات، داود (1399)، درآمدی بر روان‏شناسی هنر و ادبیات، تهران: ارجمند.
• حق‏دوست اسکوئی، سیده فاطمه و دیگران (1387)، تحلیل محتوا، فصلنامه پرستاری ایران، شماره 53، 41-52.
• خوروش، مهدی (1394)، روانشناسی شخصیت، اصفهان: سنا اصفهان.
• دادگران، سید محمد و جلیلیان، شهین (1390)، بررسی جایگاه اجتماعی زن در آثار فیلمسازان زن و مرد (کافه ترانزیت و زیر پوست شهر)، مطالعات رسانه ای، شماره 6، 67-92.
• دانش ناری، حمیدرضا و حسینی، سید حسین (1399)، تحلیل محتوای کیفی فیلم «جوکر» با رویکرد جرم‌شناسی فرهنگی، مجله جهانی رسانه - نسخه فارسی، 15(1)، 77-98. doi: 10.22059/gmj.2020.80513
• رحیم سلطانی، آرزو (1391)، مروری بر روش تحلیل محتوا، آینه پژوهش، شماره 5، 40-30.
• ساروخانی، باقر (1375)، روشهای تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی، جلد اول، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
• سلطانی گردفرامرزی، مهدی و رحمتی، محمد مهدی (1386)، شیوه بازنمایی جنسیت در سینمای ایران، مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، 3(10)، 79-98.
• شولتز، دوآن (1377)، نظریه ‏های شخصیت، ترجمه یوسف کریمی و دیگران، تهران: ارسباران.
• فاضلی، نعمت اله (1376)، آموزش تحقیق ترویج تحلیل محتوای نامه علوم اجتماعی، نمایه پژوهش شماره 2، 114-99.
• فروید، زیگموند (1930)، ناخوشایندی‏های فرهنگ، ترجمه امید مهرگان (1389)، تهران: گام نو.
• کوهن، جاش (2005)، چگونه فروید بخوانیم، ترجمه صالح نجفی (1390)، تهران: رخ‏داد نو.
• Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659-671.
• Freud, S. (2016). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In Myths and Mythologies (pp. 158-166). London, Routledge. • Freud, S. (1989). The ego and the id. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. The Ego and the Id and Other Works, 19(1923–1925), 1-66.
• Freud, S. (1995). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Se, 7, 125-243.
• Guerin, W. L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J., & Willingham, J. R. (2004). A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9), 1277-1288.
• Jarzombek, M. (2000). The psychologizing of modernity: Art, architecture, and history.
• Müller-Freienfels, R. (2013). Psychologie der Kunst: Band II, Psychologie des Kunstschaffens und der Ästhetischen Wertung. Springer-Verlag.
• Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258 284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539
• Wattenmaker, R. J., & Distel, A. (1993). Great French paintings from the Barnes Foundation: impressionist, post-impressionist, and early modern. Alfred A. Knopf Publisher; First Edition (November 14, 1995).