Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music

Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music

An Analysis of the Process of Transferring Philosophical Cosmological and Anthropological Concepts in Soul Animation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Media Arts, Faculty of Religion and Media, IRIB University, Iran.
2 Master in Science in Broadcasting, Department of Media Arts, Faculty of Religion and Media, IRIB University, Iran.
Abstract
This article examines how philosophical cosmological and anthropological concepts are translated into cinematic language in Pixar’s Soul (2020). Although animation has often been studied as a medium for communicating cultural, social, and religious themes, its capacity to convey complex philosophical ideas has received less scholarly attention. Concepts such as the soul, afterlife, personal identity, the meaning of life, and the relationship between body and spirit are highly abstract and cannot be directly perceived through ordinary experience. The present study investigates how Soul transforms these concepts into a narrative and visual form that remains accessible to a broad audience. Focusing on the film’s production process—from conceptual development and scriptwriting to visual realization—the research identifies the artistic, narrative, and technical strategies through which philosophical ideas are communicated.
The study employs a qualitative content-analysis methodology. The film itself serves as the primary object of analysis, supplemented by interviews with members of the creative team, behind-the-scenes documentaries, and scholarly sources related to the production of the film. By examining character design, world-building, visual metaphors, narrative structure, music, and animation techniques, the research explores the mechanisms through which abstract philosophical concepts are transformed into comprehensible cinematic experiences.
The findings suggest that the philosophical framework of Soul emerged from a combination of personal reflection, interdisciplinary collaboration, and extensive research. The film originated in Pete Docter’s existential reflections on success, purpose, and fulfillment. These concerns were subsequently developed through collaboration among writers, artists, animators, and consultants from diverse intellectual and cultural backgrounds. Rather than presenting a particular religious doctrine, the filmmakers sought to create a universal symbolic language capable of addressing fundamental human questions concerning existence, meaning, and transcendence.
The study demonstrates that cosmological concepts are primarily communicated through the creation of three symbolic realms: the Great Before, the Great Beyond, and the Zone. The Great Before functions as a metaphorical space in which souls acquire personality traits and prepare for earthly life. Its minimalist design, soft color palette, and abstract visual style communicate ideas related to the origins of identity and the preconditions of human existence. The Great Beyond symbolizes the mystery of death and the unknown destiny of the soul. By avoiding explicit depictions of heaven or hell, the film maintains intercultural accessibility while preserving the metaphysical ambiguity associated with death. The Zone serves as an intermediary realm linking material and spiritual existence. It represents states of creativity, concentration, and transcendence, while also illustrating the dangers of obsessive attachment through the depiction of lost souls.
Anthropological concepts are conveyed primarily through character development and narrative progression. Joe Gardner embodies the human search for purpose and self-realization. At the beginning of the story, he believes that meaning depends upon achieving a lifelong professional ambition. As the narrative unfolds, however, he discovers that the value of life cannot be reduced to a single achievement. Instead, meaning emerges through attentive engagement with everyday experiences and ordinary moments. This transformation constitutes the film’s central philosophical insight concerning human flourishing. Similarly, the character 22 represents existential uncertainty and the struggle to find reasons for living. As a soul reluctant to enter earthly existence, 22 symbolizes individuals who experience aimlessness, doubt, and a lack of direction. The relationship between Joe and 22 therefore becomes a dramatic exploration of competing attitudes toward purpose, identity, and fulfillment.
Another important finding concerns the film’s representation of the relationship between body and soul. Through its depiction of disembodied yet recognizable spiritual beings, Soul visually communicates the notion that personal identity extends beyond physical embodiment. The simplified and luminous design of the souls distinguishes spiritual existence from material existence while maintaining continuity between them. In this way, the film invites reflection on enduring philosophical questions concerning the permanence of the soul, the transience of the body, and the foundations of selfhood.
The study further highlights the role of animation techniques in philosophical communication. Color, lighting, sound, rendering technologies, and spatial design function not merely as aesthetic elements but as conceptual tools that shape viewers’ understanding of abstract ideas. Jazz music plays a particularly significant role, symbolizing creativity, passion, transcendence, and existential fulfillment. Through recurring scenes of musical performance, the film portrays artistic immersion as a means of connecting with deeper dimensions of human experience.
The article concludes that Soul provides a compelling example of how animation can communicate sophisticated philosophical concepts without sacrificing intellectual depth. By integrating visual symbolism, narrative structure, technological innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration, the film demonstrates that animation can serve as a powerful medium for philosophical reflection. Its success lies not simply in simplifying abstract ideas, but in preserving their existential significance while making them emotionally engaging and accessible to diverse audiences. Consequently, Soul illustrates the broader potential of animated cinema to explore fundamental questions concerning reality, identity, mortality, and the meaning of human life.

Keywords
Subjects

Afshar Kermani, A. (2010). A philosophical understanding of heaven and hell from the perspective of Aziz Nasafi [Fahm-e falsafī-ye behesht va dūzakh az negāh-e ‘Azīz Nasafī]. Pazhuhesh-e Dīnī, 21, 127–146. https://www.magiran.com/p1003536 (in Persian)
Alan H. Goldman, Alan, H. (2018). Life's values: Pleasure, happiness, well-being, and meaning. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/7716
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
California State University, San Bernardino. (2021, January). CSUSB professor serves as consultant on Pixar’s new film ‘Soul’. CSUSB. https://www.csusb.edu/inside/article/537310/csusb-professor-serves-consultant-pixars-new-film-soul Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition, 125(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.010
Davise, D. (2021, April). Pixar 'Soul' Creators Pete Docter & Kemp Powers. Fresh Air. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/04/22/989816812/pixar-soul-creators-pete-docter-kemp-powers
Doek, A. (2020). The breakdown with Pete docter. Rolling Stone.
Kaplan, T. (2020). Color, Light and Emotion (1,15). Jennifer Zaccaro. Inside Pixar, Pixar Animation Studios.
Kaplan, T. (2020). Creating a character (1,12). Jennifer Zaccaro. Inside Pixar, Pixar Animation Studios.
Kaplan, T. (2020). Deanna Marsigliese, The Art of the Pivot (1,2). Jennifer Zaccaro. Inside Pixar, Pixar Animation Studios. Kaplan, T. (2020). Kemp powers, writing something real (1,1). Jennifer Zaccaro. Inside Pixar, Pixar Animation Studios. Kaplan, T. (2020). The Squint Test (1,18). Jennifer Zaccaro. Inside Pixar. Pixar Animation Studios.
Karimi, M. (2021). Filmsopheh or film as philosophy: An essay on the possibility of philosophizing through film [Fīlmsafeh yā fīlm be mesābeh-ye falsafeh: Jostārī dar emkān-e falsafeh-pardāzī az ṭarīq-e fīlm]. Ta’ammolāt-e Falsafī, 27, 353–379. https://doi.org/10.30470/phm.2021.136600.1880 (in Persian)
Kiser, G. (2021, March). Pixar's demanding creative process: The making of Soul | Social + Image Lab. Dolby. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpJlVLhzFIU Lakoff, G., &
Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/430414
Lavenda, R. H., & Schultz, E. A. (2015). Core Concepts in Anthropology (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/9780078034930
Motahhari, M. (2016). An introduction to Islamic sciences: Logic and philosophy [Āshnāyī bā ‘olūm-e eslāmī: Manṭegh, falsafeh] (30th ed.). Enteshārāt-e Ṣadrā. (in Persian)
Mousavi Ahmadi Zaviyeh, A., Hasanaei, S. S., & Seyed Saeed, M. R. (2018). Representation of religious themes in animation through an examination of the patterns employed in Japanese works [Bāznamāyī-ye mażāmīn-e mazhabī dar anīmeīshen bā barrasī-ye olgūhā-ye be-kār gerefteh-shodeh dar āthār-e ژاپنی]. Honarhā-ye Zībā: Honarhā-ye Namāyeshī va Mūsīqī, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfadram.2017.242877.615132 (in Persian)
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0025327
Rasouli Sharbiani, R., & Abdollahi, A. H. (2009). A comparison of Ibn Arabi’s and Mulla Sadra’s views on the nature of heaven and hell [Moghāyeseh-ye dīdgāh-e Ibn ‘Arabī va Mollā Ṣadrā darbāreh-ye māhīyat-e behesht va dūzakh]. Rahnamun, 23–24, 131–146. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/751243 (in Persian)
Ryden, B. (2017). Introduction to cosmology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316651087 Safoura, M. A. (2013). Methods of representing cultural-social themes in Iranian television animation productions from 1979 to 2010 and their comparison with British productions in terms of content structure [Shīvehā-ye bāznamāyī-ye mażāmīn-e farhangī–ejtemā‘ī dar tolīdāt-e anīmeīshen-e televīzyūnī-ye Īrān az sāl-e 1357 tā 1389 va moghāyeseh-ye ān bā tolīdāt-e keshvar-e Engelis, be leḥāẓ-e sāḵtār-e moḥtavāyī] ] Doctoral dissertation, Iran University of Art[. Electronic Dissertations and Theses Iran University of Art (ETDs). (in Persian)
Screenplayed Breakdown. (2021, February). ‘Soul’ with Writer Mike Jones. https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/screenplayed/episodes/Soul-with-Writer-Mike-Jones-eqnh7r Tabarsi, F. b. H. (1971). Translation of Tafsir Majma‘ al-Bayan [Tarjomeh-ye Tafsīr-e Majma‘ al-Bayān] (Vol. 230) (H. Rasouli, Trans.). Farahani. (Original work published 536 AH) (in Persian)
Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1999). Translation of Tafsir al-Mizan [Tarjomeh-ye Tafsīr al-Mīzān] ( Vols. 12 & 17). (M. B. Mousavi, Trans). Jāme‘eh-ye Modarresīn-e Ḥowzeh-ye ‘Elmīyeh-ye Qom, Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī. (Original work published 1971) (in Persian)
Varmazyar Najafi, B. (2018). The transmission of believing life skills to children in television animations: A case study of the “Life Skills” series [Chegūnegī-ye enteghāl-e mahārathā-ye zendegī-ye mo’menāneh be kūdakān dar anīmeīshen-hā-ye televīzyūnī bā moṭāle‘eh-ye mowredī-ye majmū‘eh-ye Mahārathā-ye Zendegī] ] Master’s thesis, IRIB University[. Electronic Dissertations and Theses IRIB University (ETDs). (in Persian)
Westminstertownhall. (2015, November). Pete docter - Inside the creative community: The power and process of animated film. Minneapolis, United States.
Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33
افشار کرمانی، عزیزالله. (1389). فهم فلسفی بهشت و دوزخ از نگاه عزیز نسفی. پژوهش دینی، 21، 127-146. https://www.magiran.com/p1003536
رسولی شربیانی، رضا و عبداللهی، امیر حسین. (1388). مقایسه دیدگاه ابن عربی و ملاصدرا درباره ماهیت بهشت و دوزخ. رهنمون، 23 و 24: 131-146. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/751243
صفورا، محمدعلی. (1392). شیوه‌های بازنمایی مضامین فرهنگی-اجتماعی در تولیدات انیمیشن تلویزیونی ایران از سال 1357 تا 1389: و مقایسه آن با تولیدات کشور انگلیس، به لحاظ ساختار محتوایی [رساله دکتری، دانشگاه هنرایران]. پایان‌نامه‌ها و رساله‌های الکترونیکی دانشگاه هنر ایران.
طباطبایی، سید محمدحسین. (1378). ترجمه تفسیر المیزان (جلد 12 و 17) (محمدباقر موسوی، مترجم). جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم، دفتر انتشارات اسلامی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1350)
طبرسی، فضل بن حسن. (1352). ترجمه تفسیر مجمع‌البیان (جلد 23) (هاشم رسولی، مترجم). فراهانی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 536 ه.ق)
کرمی، محسن. (1400). فیلمسفه یا فیلم به مثابه فلسفه: جستاری در امکان فلسفه‌پردازی از طریق فیلم. تأملات فلسفی، 27، 353-379. https://doi.org/10.30470/phm.2021.136600.1880
مطهری، مرتضی. (1395). آشنایی با علوم اسلامی: منطق، فلسفه (چاپ 30). انتشارات صدرا.
موسوی، احمدی زاویه؛ حسنایی، سعیده سادات و سید سعید، محمدرضا. (1397). بازنمایی مضامین مذهبی در انیمیشن با بررسی الگوهای به‌کار گرفته‌شده در آثار ژاپنی. نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی، 23(1)، 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfadram.2017.242877.615132
ورمزیار نجفی، بهمن. (1397). چگونگی انتقال مهارت‌های زندگی مؤمنانه به کودکان در انیمیشن‌های تلویزیونی با مطالعه موردی مجموعه مهارت‌های زندگی [پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد،دانشگاه صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران]. پایان‌نامه‌ها و رساله‌های الکترونیکی دانشگاه صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران.