Filmic Representation of the Existential Concept of Friendship in the Film Where is the Friend's House?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Media Arts, Faculty of Religion and Media, IRIB University, Iran.

2 MSc. of Production, IRIB University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This study examines the cinematic representation of the existential concept of friendship in Where Is the Friend’s House? by Abbas Kiarostami. Employing a neo-formalist approach, the research focuses on key cinematic elements to reveal how the film portrays friendship as an existential phenomenon. The film is analyzed through its dramatic narrative, cinematography, lighting, sound, and editing, each contributing to the depiction of responsibility, ethical choice, and an existential understanding of friendship.

In narrative, the film employs a simple yet multilayered structure to depict an existential journey. Ahmad, the child protagonist, faces a critical decision between conforming to social norms and pursuing a personal ethical commitment, symbolized by his quest to deliver his friend’s notebook. Although this act appears mundane, it raises fundamental questions of individual responsibility. Throughout his journey, Ahmad encounters obstacles ranging from adult indifference to environmental constraints. This minimalist narrative emphasizes existential commitment and positions the young protagonist in stark contrast to established social and familial systems.

Regarding cinematography, the film utilizes restricted framing and specific camera angles to evoke tension and confinement reflective of social limitations. In contrast, wider shots capture moments of freedom and the potential for choice, highlighting the dual aspects of the protagonist’s experience. The fluid movement of the camera along Ahmad’s path reinforces the arduous nature of his journey and his relentless search for meaning, accentuating both external challenges and inner resolve.

Lighting, predominantly natural, plays a crucial role in establishing the film’s neorealist aesthetic and dramatic atmosphere. The interplay between light and shadow, especially evident in the contrast between interior and exterior scenes, serves as a metaphor for the protagonist’s psychological state. Gradual shifts in illumination along Ahmad’s journey not only signify the passage of time but also mirror his evolving emotional and mental landscape, underlining the transformative aspect of his quest.

Sound further enhances the film’s existential quality. Through prolonged silences, ambient noises such as wind and the sound of Ahmad’s footsteps, and sparse dialogue, the film creates an auditory environment that reinforces feelings of loneliness, introspection, and internal quest. In the absence of a musical score, these natural sound elements effectively regulate the film’s rhythm while conveying a palpable sense of anxiety and disorientation.

Editing is executed in a minimalist style. By removing extraneous details and avoiding rapid cuts, the editing establishes a steady, contemplative rhythm that deepens the viewer’s empathy with Ahmad. The continuity of time and deliberate pacing ensure that the audience remains focused on his quest, gradually building suspense and inviting reflection on the existential dimensions of his journey.

Overall, the findings indicate that Where Is the Friend’s House? portrays friendship not merely as a social relationship but as an existential and responsible act that confronts the individual with fundamental choices. Kiarostami’s use of formal techniques and his minimalist aesthetic encapsulate the inherent existential concerns of human life, revealing that friendship is a foundational experience of responsibility and a profound encounter with the Other. This comprehensive analysis ultimately underscores the film’s remarkable, profound philosophical and aesthetic significance.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Antonioni, M. (1960). L'Avventura.
Antonioni, M. (1966). Blow-Up.
Bazin, A. (1971a). The Ontology of the Photographic Image. In What is Cinema? edited and translated by Hugh Gray, University of California Press.
Bazin, A. (1971b). The Myth of Total Cinema. In: What is Cinema? edited and translated by Hugh Gray, University of California Press.
Bergman, I. (1963). The Silence.
Bergman, I. (1957). The Seventh Seal.
Bordwell, D. Thompson, K. & Smith, J. (2024). Film Art: An Introduction (13th Edition). McGraw-Hill Education.
Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufman, Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Daryae Lal, B. Zare, L. Panahi, S. & Mokhtabad Amrei, M. (2023/1401). Explaining the components of space in Kiarostami’s cinema: A phenomenological approach [Tabyīn-e mo‘allefeh-hā-ye fazā dar sīnemā-ye Kiarostamī bā rūkard-e padīdār-shenākhtī]. Iranian Political Sociology Monthly, 7(5), 2713–2728. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.356799.3852
Daryae Lal, B. Zare, L. Panahi, S. & Mokhtabad Amrei, M. (2023). A hierarchical exploration of concepts of change from popular (kitsch) art to meaningful architecture and cinema in Iran, with an identity-oriented approach [Vākāvī-ye selseleh-marāteb-e mafhūm-e taghyīr az honar-e ‘āmmeh-pasand tā sīnemā-ye ma‘nāgarā dar Īrān bā rūkard-e hovīyat-maḥvar]. Islamic Art Studies, 52(20), 284–301. (in Persian) 10.22034/ias.2022.352341.2026
Dinparast, M. & Shahba, M. (2014). Philosophical interpretations of Kiarostami’s cinema with emphasis on Jean-Luc Nancy’s ideas [Ta’wīlhā-ye falsafī az sīnemā-ye Kiarostamī bā ta’kīd bar ā’rā-ye Jean-Luc Nancy]. Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture, 7(4), 46–63. (in Persian) https://mediastudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1304.html?lang=en
Engell, L. (2014). Where Is the Friend’s House? In S. von Berswordt & O. Fahle (Eds.), Abbas Kiarostami: Die Erzeugung von Sichtbarkeit. Marburg: Schüren.
Eslami, M. (2019). Concepts of film criticism [Mafāhīm-e naqd-e film]. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (in Persian)
Gohar-Bakhsh, M. Rostami, P. & Madani, M. (2020). Spirituality in Kiarostami’s cinema: A case study of Taste of Cherry [Ma‘navīyat dar sīnemā-ye Kiarostamī bā motāle‘eh-ye moredī-ye film-e Ta‘m-e Gīlās]. Bi-monthly Journal of Art and Humanities Research, 32, 59–67. (in Persian) https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/
Heidegger, M. (2023). Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes [Sar-āghāz-e kār-e honarī] (P. Zia-Shahabi, Trans.). Tehran: Hermes Publishing. (Original work published 1950) (in Persian)
Heidegger, M. (2024). Sein und Zeit [Hastī va zaman] (A. Rashidian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published 1927) (in Persian)
Janaway, C. (2016). Schopenhauer: A very short introduction [Rāhnamā-ye Schopenhauer] (R. Vali-Yari, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publishing. (Original work published 1994) (in Persian)
Kaufmann, W. (1956). Existentialism: From Dostoevsky to Sartre. Meridian Books. Khalouei, H. (2023). A comparative analysis of form and content between the film Where Is the Friend’s Home? and Sohrab Sepehri’s poem The Address [Tahlīl-e tatbīghī-ye sūrat va maẓmūn miyān-e film-e Khāneh-ye dust kojāst? va she‘r-e Neshānī]. Comparative Literature, 29(15), 149–185. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22103/jcl.2023.20258.3534
Kiarostami, A. (1992). Entretien avec Abbas Kiarostami. Cahiers du Cinéma, 462, 36–39.
Kierkegaard, S. (1980). The concept of anxiety (R. Thomte, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1844)
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Either/Or: A fragment of life (A. Hannay, Trans.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1843)
Kierkegaard, S. (2024). Fear and trembling [Tars va larz] (A. Rashidian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published 1843) (in Persian)
Lim, S. E. (2020). Realism, Morality, and Care in Where Is the Friend’s Home? Senses of Cinema, 95. https://www.sensesofcinema.com/
Malekian, M. (1998). History of philosophy [Tārīkh-e falsafeh] (Vol. 1). Tehran: Center for Cooperation between Hawzeh and University. (in Persian)
Marcel, G. (1951). The Mystery of Being: Reflection and Mystery. Volume I, Harvill Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2024). Phénoménologie de la perception [Padīdār-shenāsī-ye edrāk-e ḥessī] (M. Olia, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published 1945) (in Persian)
Monaco, J. (2009). How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Mosayebi, Z. (20120). Childhood narratives in Iranian cinema: A case study of Where Is the Friend’s Home? and End of Dreams [Revāyat-hā-ye kūdakī dar sīnemā-ye Īrān]. Quarterly Journal of Society, Culture and Media, 33(8), 101-120. (in Persian) https://www.jscm.ir/article_109298.html?lang=en
Nafisy, H. (2011). A Social History of Iranian Cinema, Volume 3: The Islamicate Period, 1978–1984. Duke University Press. Nasiri Hanis, J. Shayeganfar, N. & Alasti, A. (2020). Metafilm and the relation between “self” and “other” in Abbas Kiarostami’s cinema [Farāfilm va nesbat-e khod va dīgarī dar sīnemā-ye ‘Abbās Kiarostamī]. Cultural and Communication Studies Quarterly, 49(21), 227–254. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2019.191830.2846
Nietzsche, F. (2021). Jenseits von Gut und Böse [Farāso-ye nīk va bad] (D. Ashouri, Trans.). Tehran: Kharazmi Publications. (Original work published 1886) (in Persian)
Nietzsche, F. (2023). Zur Genealogie der Moral [Tabār-shenāsī-ye akhlāq] (D. Ashouri, Trans.). Tehran: Agah Publishing. (Original work published 1887) (in Persian)
Nietzsche, F. (2024). Also sprach Zarathustra [Chonīn goft Zartosht] (D. Ashouri, Trans.). Tehran: Agah Publishing. (Original work published 1883–1885) (in Persian)
Sartre, J.P. (2017). L'être et le néant [Hastī va nīstī] (M. Bahraini, Trans.). Tehran: Niloufar Publications. (Original work published 1943) (in Persian)
Sheibani K. (2006). Kiarostami and the Aesthetics of Modern Persian Poetry. Iranian Studies, 39(4): 509-537. http://doi.org/10.1080/00210860601005088
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as Technique. In: Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis (Eds. and Trans.), Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 3–24. (Original work published 1917)
Tarkovsky, A. (1989). Sculpting in Time. Translated by (Kitty Hunter-Blair, Trans.). University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1986)
Thompson, K. (1998). The Neoformalist Method in Film Criticism [Roshe-ye Neoformalisti dar Naqd-e Film] (M. Gozarabad, Trans). Farabi Journal, 31, 114–145. (Original work published 1988) (in Persian) https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/
White, J. (2002). Children, Narrative and Third Cinema in Iran and Syria. Revue Canadienne d'Études cinématographiques / Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 11(1), 78-97. http://dio.org/10.3138/cjfs.11.1.78
Wiel, R. & Kiss, M. (2022). Complex Film Narratives. The Routledge Companion to Narrative Theory. Routledge.
اسلامی، مجید (1398). مفاهیم نقد فیلم. نشر نی.
تامسون، کریستین (1377). روش نئوفرمالیستی در نقد فیلم (محمد گذرآبادی، مترجم). مجله فارابی، 31،114 -145. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1988) https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/
جانُوِی، کریستوفر (1395). راهنمای شوپنهاور (رضا ولی‌یاری، مترجم). نشر مرکز. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1994)
خالویی، حسام (1402). تحلیل تطبیقی اقتباس در فیلم «خانه دوست کجاست؟» و شعر «نشانی» سهراب سپهری. ادبیات تطبیقی، 29(15): 149-185. https://doi.org/10.22103/jcl.2023.20258.3534
دریای لعل، بهرنگ. زارع، لیلا، پناهی، سیامک و مختاباد امرئی، مصطفی (1401). تبیین مؤلفه‌های فضا در سینمای کیارستمی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسانه. ماهنامه جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی ایران، 7(5)، 2713-2728. https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.356799.3852
دریای لعل، بهرنگ، زارع، لیلا، پناهی، سیامک و مختاباد امرئی، مصطفی (1402). واکاوی سلسله مراتبی مفاهیم تغییر از هنر عامه‌پسند (کیچ) تا معماری و سینمای معناگرا در ایران با رویکرد هویت محور (نمونه موردی: فیلم خانه دوست کجاست؟ عباس کیارستمی). مطالعات هنر اسلامی، 52(20)، 301-284. https://www.sysislamicartjournal.ir/article_156188.html?lang=fa
دین‌پرست، منوچهر و شهبا، محمد (1393). تأویل‌های فلسفی از سینمای کیارستمی با تأکید بر آراء ژان لوک نانسی. مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در رسانه و فرهنگ، 7(4)، 63-46. https://mediastudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1304.html?lang=fa
سارتر، ژان پل (1396). هستی و نیستی (مهستی بحرینی، مترجم). انتشارات نیلوفر. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1943)
کیِرکگور، سورن (1403). ترس‌ولرز (عبدالکریم رشیدیان، مترجم). نشر نی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1843)
گهربخش، محمدجواد، رستمی، پدرام و مدنی، مجتبی (1399). معنویت در سینمای کیارستمی با مطالعه موردی فیلم طعم گیلاس. دوماهنامه پژوهش در هنر و علوم انسانی، 56، 231-240. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/
مرلوپونتی، موریس (1403). پدیدارشناسی ادراک حسی (مسعود علیا، مترجم). نشر نی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1945)
مسیبی، زینب (1398). تحلیل روایت کودکی در سینمای ایران: مطالعه موردی فیلم‌های «خانه دوست کجاست؟» و «پایان رؤیاها». فصلنامه جامعه، فرهنگ و رسانه، 33(8): 102-120. https://www.jscm.ir/article_109298.html
ملکیان، مصطفی (1377). تاریخ فلسفه (ج. 1). دفتر همکاری حوزه و دانشگاه.
نصیری هانیس، جلال، شایگان‌فر، نادر و الستی،احمد (1399). فرافیلم و نسبت «خود» و «دیگری» در سینمای عباس کیارستمی. فصلنامه مطالعات فرهنگ و ارتباطات، 49(21)، 227-254. https://doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2019.191830.2846
نیچه، فردریش (1400). فراسوی نیک و بد (داریوش آشوری، مترجم). انتشارات خوارزمی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1888)
نیچه، فردریش (1402). تبارشناسی اخلاق (داریوش آشوری، مترجم). نشر آگاه. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1887)
نیچه، فردریش (1403). چنین گفت زرتشت (داریوش آشوری، مترجم). نشر آگاه. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1885)
هیدگر، مارتین (1403). هستی و زمان (عبدالکریم رشیدیان، مترجم). نشر نی. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1927)
هیدگر، مارتین (1402). سرآغاز کار هنری (پرویز ضیاء شهابی، مترجم). نشر هرمس. (چاپ اثر اصلی 1950)
Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music
Volume 31, Issue 1
February 2026
Pages 57-70

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics