Assessing Daniel Yacavon's Critique of Merleau-Ponty's Film Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student of Art Research, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Higher Arts Research and Entrepreneurship, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Higher Art Research and Entrepreneurship, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

This study aims to critically evaluate Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological film theory, specifically addressing the critiques posed by the contemporary philosopher Daniel Yacavone. Merleau-Ponty’s theory characterizes cinema as a "temporal gestalt," where meaning is dynamically constructed through the interaction between individual film elements and the overall structure. This research seeks not only to reassess Yacavon’s criticisms but also to highlight the enduring relevance and potential areas for expansion of Merleau-Ponty’s ideas within the field of film studies. Daniel Yacavone, as a theorist in the field of film philosophy, focuses on certain limitations of Merleau-Ponty's film theory and presents four fundamental critiques. Employing a qualitative and critical approach, this study revisits the core concepts of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of cinema, while thoroughly examining the specific critiques made by Yacavone. Yacavone’s main points of contention include Merleau-Ponty’s alleged insufficient attention to technical elements such as camera movement and mise-en-scène; an incomplete understanding of the concept of the body; and an overemphasis on human experience, thus neglecting non-human perspectives and a failure to consider the cultural and symbolic meanings embedded in films. Through detailed textual analysis of primary and secondary sources, this research explores the validity and implications of Yakavon's arguments against the theoretical framework established by Merleau-Ponty. The findings reveal that although Yakavon’s critiques successfully highlight certain aspects that Merleau-Ponty’s initial theory might have overlooked, they often fail to appreciate the depth of Merleau-Ponty’s insight regarding the role of the body in perception and the integral nature of temporality in cinematic experience. Contrary to Yakavon’s interpretations, Merleau-Ponty places significant emphasis on the temporal experience as opposed to mere bodily presence, suggesting a more intricate interplay of bodily engagement within filmic perception. Furthermore, this study points out that while Merleau-Ponty’s approach could benefit from integrating more robust discussions of technical, cultural, and symbolic dimensions, it still provides a profound foundational framework for understanding cinematic experiences. The results of the research show that Merleau-Ponty's meaning of the role of the body in perception is in conflict with Yacavone’s claim. Also, for Merleau-Ponty, the more important principle is temporality, not embodiment as mentioned in Yacavone’s reading. The study concludes that Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological film theory, despite the critiques brought forward by Yacavone, is a crucial theoretical resource in film studies. Yacavon’s criticisms, while valuable, push the discourse forward by prompting a deeper reevaluation and extension of phenomenological approaches to include contemporary cinematic techniques and cultural theories. This research advocates for a renewed engagement with Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology, suggesting adaptations that incorporate contemporary perspectives to enrich the understanding of film as a medium. It underscores the necessity of revisiting and adapting Merleau-Ponty's insights to meet the evolving analytical demands of modern film studies and to effectively bridge the gaps identified by Yacavone.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ayfre, A. (1985). Néo Réalism ET Phénoménologie, Cahiers du Cinéma 17, reprinted and translated in Cahiers du Cinéma: The 1950’s, ed. Jim Hillier, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Baracco, A. (2017). Phenomenology of Film. In Hermeneutics of the Film World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65400-3_2
Barker, J. (2009). The Tactile Eye: Touch and the Cinematic Experience. University of California Press.
Bazin, A. (2005). The Ontology of the Photographic Image,” in What Is Cinema? Trans. Hugh Gray, Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
Benjamin, S. (2017). Merleau-Ponty’s Immanent Critique of Gestalt Theory. Human Studies, 40(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9420-1
Burge, T. (2022). Perception: First Form of Mind. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871002.001.0001
Carroll, N. (1988). Film/Mind Analogies: The Case of Hugo Munsterberg, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 46(4), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.2307/431286
Cavell, S. (1979). The world viewed: Reflections on The ontology of film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory [Osole Ravesh Tahghigh Keifi, Nazarieheye Mabnaei, Ravieha va Shiveha] (Biouk Mohammadi, Trans.). Pahoheshhaye olome ensani va motaleat farhangi. (Original work published 1997) (in Persian)
Crowther, P. (2012). The Phenomenology of Modern Art: Exploding Deleuze, Illuminating Style London: Continuum. Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The Movement Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Gholami, T. (2013). Cézanne and Merleau-Ponty. Kimia-ye Honar, 2(6), 51–62. https://kimiahonar.ir/article-1-72-fa.pdf (in Persian)
Guillemet, J. (2010). The New Wave of French phenomenology and cinema: new concepts for the cinematic experience. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 8(1), 94- 114.https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300903529398
Handy, E. (2019). Dancing with images: embodied photographic viewing. Open arts journals, 45(7), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.5456/ISSN.2050-3679/2019S02
Karbun, M. (2023). The Flesh of images: Merleau-Ponty between painting and cinema [Badanmandie tasavir: Merleau-Ponty bein tasvir va cineam] (Ali Akbar Taghavi, Trans.). Farahonar Publications. (Original work published 2011) (in Persian) Khanifar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2023). Foundations and principles of qualitative research methods [Mabani va osoule raveshhaye pazhohesh keifi] (Vol. 2). Negah-e Danesh Publications. (in Persian)
Loht, S. (2019). The Phenomenological Movement in Context of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19601-1_13
Metz, C. (1974). Film Language: a Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. Bertrand August. University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1974). Phenomenology of perception. London: New York: Routledge & K. Paul; Humanities Press. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Art and the World of Perception, in the World of Perception, trans. Oliver Davis. Routledge. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Film and the New Psychology, Sense and Non-Sense, trans. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Northwestern University Press.
Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University Press.
Peperzak, Adriaan T. Thinking about Thinking: What Kind of Conversation Is Philosophy? Fordham University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823293353
Piravi Vanak, M. (2010). Phenomenology in the thought of Merleau-Ponty [Padidarshenasi nazd merleau-Ponty]. Porsesh Publications. (in Persian)
Primozic, D. T. (2009). Merleau-Ponty: Philosophy and meaning (M. R. Abolghasemi, Trans.). Markaz Publishing. (Original work published 2001) (in Persian)
Quicke, A. (2005). Phenomenology and Film: An Examination of a Religious Approach to Film Theory by Henri Agel and Amedee Ayfre. Journal of Media and Religion, 4(4), 235-250. Doi: 10.1207/S15328415JMR0404_2
Sobchack, V. (1992). The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton University Press.
Sorfa, D. (2016). What is Film-Philosophy? Film-Philosophy, 20(1):1-5. Doi: 10.3366/FILM.2016.0001
Stadler, J. (2014). Affect, film and. In E. Branigan & W. Buckland (Eds.), The Routledge encyclopedia of film theory (pp. 1–6). Routledge.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory ] Osool-e Ravesh-e Tahghigh-e Keyfi: Nazariye-ye Mabna-yi, Roye-ha va Shive-ha[. (B. Mohammadi, Trans.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Original work published 1997) (in Persian)
Tomasulo, F. P. (1988). The Text-in-the-Spectator: The Role of Phenomenology in an Eclectic Theoretical Methodology. Journal of Film and Video, 40(2), 20–32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ377438
Won-Leep, M. (2018). Documentary and its realism. Studies in Documentary Film, 12(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2017.1420413
Yacavone, D. (2016). Film and the phenomenology of art: Reappraising Merleau-Ponty on cinema as form, medium, and expression. New Literary History, 47(1), 159-185. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/NLH.2016.0001
استراس، آنسلم و جولیت کوربین (۱۳۸۷). اصول روش تحقیق کیفی، نظریه مبنایی، رویه‌ها و شیوه‌ها (بیوک محمدی، مترجم). انتشارات پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. (چاپ اثر اصلی ۱۹۹۷)
پریموزیک، دنیل تامس (۱۳۸۸). مرلوپونتی، فلسفه و معنا (محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، مترجم). نشر مرکز، (چاپ اثر اصلی ۲۰۰۱).
پیراوی ونک، مرضیه (۱۳۸۹). پدیدارشناسی نزد مرلوپونتی. انتشارات پرسش.
خنیفر، حسین و ناهید مسلمی (۱۴۰۲). مبانی و اصول روش‌های پژوهش کیفی (جلد دوم). انتشارات نگاه دانش.
غلامی، طاهره (1392). سزان و مرلوپونتی. کیمیای هنر، 2 (۶)، 51-62. https://kimiahonar.ir/article-1-72-fa.pdf
کاربن، مارو (۱۴۰۲). بدن‌مندی تصاویر؛ مرلوپونتی در میانه نقاشی و سینما (علی‌اصغر تقوی، مترجم) انتشارات فراهنر. (چاپ اثر اصلی ۲۰۱۱).
Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music
Volume 31, Issue 2
May 2026
Pages 55-65

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics